Utah Valley
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
595  Samantha Heaton FR 21:03
974  Harley Murray JR 21:33
1,043  Jasmine Nesbitt JR 21:38
1,105  Savannah Berry SO 21:42
1,149  McKayla Morgan SO 21:46
1,523  Bridget Hazel JR 22:11
1,528  Shevaun Ames SO 22:12
1,796  Jeni Townsend FR 22:28
1,903  Taylor Gomez SR 22:36
National Rank #167 of 339
Mountain Region Rank #17 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Samantha Heaton Harley Murray Jasmine Nesbitt Savannah Berry McKayla Morgan Bridget Hazel Shevaun Ames Jeni Townsend Taylor Gomez
Roy Griak Invitational 09/26 1181 21:11 21:37 22:44 21:09 22:15 21:27 22:06 21:39 22:39
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/17 1223 21:19 21:43 22:07 21:38 21:59 22:31 22:13 22:29 22:43
Western Athletic Conference Championships 10/31 1186 21:06 21:18 21:53 22:00 21:16 22:20 22:20 23:23 22:28
Mountain Region Championships 11/13 1145 20:43 21:34 21:11 22:01 21:37 22:13





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 15.9 436 0.0 0.3 1.6 3.8 7.3 10.5 13.9 16.1 24.7 19.8 1.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Samantha Heaton 64.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Harley Murray 87.3
Jasmine Nesbitt 91.7
Savannah Berry 95.2
McKayla Morgan 98.7
Bridget Hazel 114.7
Shevaun Ames 114.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 0.3% 0.3 10
11 1.6% 1.6 11
12 3.8% 3.8 12
13 7.3% 7.3 13
14 10.5% 10.5 14
15 13.9% 13.9 15
16 16.1% 16.1 16
17 24.7% 24.7 17
18 19.8% 19.8 18
19 1.9% 1.9 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0